# New tab behaviour / max 9 charts **URL:** \ **Category:** đź’ˇ Feature suggestions & ideas\ **Created:** [August 31, 2020, 10:42am UTC](https://community.trading212.com/t/new-tab-behaviour-max-9-charts/18032 "2020-08-31T10:42:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![sdrj](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/58956e/32.png) [@sdrj](https://community.trading212.com/u/sdrj)\ **Post date:** [August 31, 2020, 10:42am UTC](https://community.trading212.com/t/new-tab-behaviour-max-9-charts/18032/1 "2020-08-31T10:42:40Z")
The 9-tab limit is a real pain when browsing stocks: what should be a simple, single click turns into clicking _Open Chart_, getting the “You can open up to 9 chart windows” warning, closing a tab, then clicking _Open Chart_ again. Not a great UX. Can there be a Settings option to define how the user wants Open Chart to behave when there are already 9 charts open, with the options: - Don’t open new chart [current 212 behaviour] - Replace current chart [replaces currently active chart with the new one] - Replace chart 9 [always replaces chart 9 with the new chart, and switches to that chart if it’s not the currently selected chart already] If you want to be smart, you could also have a “Revert to previous chart” button available when a chart was replaced, just in case the user didn’t intend for that chart to be replaced. ---
**Author:** ![phildawson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bbe5ce/32.png) [@phildawson](https://community.trading212.com/u/phildawson)\ **Post date:** [August 31, 2020, 10:47am UTC](https://community.trading212.com/t/new-tab-behaviour-max-9-charts/18032/2 "2020-08-31T10:47:00Z")
Id love to just be able to have as many as needed. ---
**Author:** ![Hectares](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/community.trading212.com/hectares/32/5426_2.png) [@Hectares](https://community.trading212.com/u/Hectares)\ **Post date:** [August 31, 2020, 11:07am UTC](https://community.trading212.com/t/new-tab-behaviour-max-9-charts/18032/3 "2020-08-31T11:07:09Z")
I support this suggestion