I am just looking at MIRIās website.
Can anyone confirm that what they do is the incorporate a personalised advertisement into an already runing film?
For example, if a black poster appears on the film they might add a non-obvious advert onto it?
Have I understood correctly?
If that is so, it sounds like a great idea from a company perspective.
On the other hand a market cap of 140 million GBP for revenue of 2 million does not sound as great. Growing revenue at 100% year on year though.
Thatās good to hear tbh. One Iām gutted about was last year around the end of April, BOTB was on my radar but I couldnāt get a trade for over a day and gave up. I wish Iād just waited now! 
@Finki I keep toying with the idea of opening an FT account but my only use would be AIM stocks and I just donāt hold enough to justify a second brokerage account
@EquityInvestor Sort of, they have their software pick out spots where they could place an advert, which doesnāt necessarily mean a blank poster, but like adding a billboard to a plain brick wall. Or sides of buses. Now I probably wouldnāt use the term āslips inā or āonline videosā alone but the video shows the idea Mirriad's AI slips ads into empty spaces in online videos - Mirriad
Similar to Bidstack, just TV/Cinema/Video over games. Though Iād agree Iām not completely sold on buying in at MIRIās current price point , and its just bounced off its original list price downwards.
This is fascinating technology.
Thanks @PorterOldSlug
You have to become a āPlusā member on FT to access any AIM stocks that are not listed on the AIM-100. Also, there arenāt that many missing from T212. I can only thing of a handful such as Water Intelligence, Seeing Machines and Eurasia Mining, but I have definitely encountered a couple more. Not many.
So, for 10 pounds a month I donāt think itās worth it.
I think @PorterOldSlug is more getting at the horrible execution times for some AIM stocks on 212 as opposed to FT who are set up differently and see trades executed much quicker on that exchange.
Valid concern - perhaps not a big deal for BIDS - but as you say, worth their monthly chargeā¦?
Yep it would only be for the fact that FT uses market makers for their AIM stocks where as T212 goes direct to market so waiting for a matching trade can be extremely frustrating. Iād agree for the Ā£10 a month its not worth it so Iāve mostly been avoiding AIM stocks on T212.
I donāt personally mind the executions as they do warn you that the Stock has low Liquidity and if you are happy to pay between 2p on the Stock it is worth holding on in the long run.
Of course I want the execution to be lightning fast but I do expect these AIM Stocks to have longer periods.
Talking about something being frustratingā¦ not having live prices is very annoying. When you put an buy or sell order on FT you donāt know what comes out.
I tend to check Google beforehand for a better idea.
But it is good that there are other platforms available such as FT, it gives us (customers) choice and in this case access to other stocks 
.
Okay, youāve convinced me, Iām in. If it all goes wrong I blame all of you personally.
Donāt take it from me. Take it from this trustworthy-looking fellow;
Donāt know about you, but Iād follow that wig into battle!
Iāve got to agree with Joey here, how could you not trust the wig?! (Ignoring the fact that video has now been made private)
Okay, I donāt know who that is.
No one knowsā¦ 
(check the top of the thread)
Ha ha interesting. Definitely planning to sell if he hasnāt already! 
Tbh I wouldnāt be surprised if it was changed to private after it tanked at earnings. People are petty and I imagine a lot of hate would be inbound for it! 
Seen it a few times recently, where companies have given good earning reports causing share prices to dump. (Not saying Bidstack had good earnings, just from other stocks)
@admins - can you udpate the feed for BIDS please? Showing as 6.43p on the platform but currently 5.90p in truth;
Any more news on BIDS? Do we know when they release full year results? Canāt see anything in their last RNS.
Itās in April but not sure of the exact date.
Itās early! 
On first view it looks very slick but there are clearly things missing and some formatting issues.
Items of concern are potential gaps in notes 15&16.
The directors state the going concern is conditional on further funding, but no reference to what this may be at all.
They also state chunky receivables due if about 12m iirc, but when are these expected?
As investors, you canāt state the need for further funding, but not disclose an estimate of that level or when details will be announced. Do they need it or not?