@HuskyDogg care to share some more details where EU customers are protected up to £1.02m - there was a lot of chat post Brexit that EU customers were worse off (protection wise), so how have they suddenly got a better deal?
Well the fscs & ICF are guaranteed protection on cash government backed - We don’t know what the 1.0m Lloyds insurance covers so don’t get to excited until you’ve seen the T&C’s to determine if it’s what the paper it’s written on
There has been a lot of talk about this, but I am still convinced that the mentioned insurance of £85,000 refers to money in the bank, not to stocks, etc. For example, if you have £200,000 in stocks and £50,000 in cash on your Trading 212 brokerage account, that £50,000 will be held in a bank account, such as JPMorgan Chase Bank. If JPMorgan Chase Bank goes bankrupt, you will not lose that £50,000 because the government guarantees up to £85,000. In short, the £85,000 applies exclusively to money held in the account. The stocks you own should be yours (unless they are borrowed), and they will not disappear in case Trading 212 goes bankrupt, as they are held in an account with IBKR.
What is an interesting read is if you search for failed UK brokers - and what has happened historically.
In the end, no other broker afaik offers more than the regulatory protection guidelines, and we do not know exactly the terms of the EU entity deal to compare.
Now don’t quote me on this, but what I understood the last time we had this debate is the other way around.
Cash on UK entity is insured up to 85k£, while cash on the EU is insured up to 20k€. The Lloyd 1M€ insurance, if i recall correctly, is not per customer, but for the whole entity?
In any case, I wouldn’t mind a little refresher from @Team212 on who is insured by how much
Of course the FSCS doesn’t cover the market, credit and other risks related to the financial instruments itself. Only the counterparty risk, aka financial intermediaries regulated in UK.