No, that’s part of how CFDs are priced. If holding a CFD overnight, you will pay fees.
If you want an inverse QQQ position, on the invest platform there are some. At the very least EQQQ from Invesco, without overnight fees then.
Although it probably carries some high fees for an ETF, it is quite likely to be cheaper than CFDs.
May not perform as well as a short QQQ over a few days tho, because of daily calculation.
Unfortunately, there aren’t any (-1x) Nasdaq inverse ETPs in Europe → just an inverse (-3x). That said, you can find inverse (-1x), (-2x), or (-3x) ETPs on the S&P 500.
@adindas, as @Oktay mentioned there aren’t any -1x QQQ ETPs in Europe.
At GraniteShares, we see our FAANG suite of ETPs as an alternative for tech sector investors and traders that utilize products linked to Nasdaq 100. Bigger picture, Tech index investing (related ETFs (QQQ A-)), has changed in recent years. The Nasdaq 100 index historically has been very tech-focused but has evolved to now include stocks like Pepsi, Starbucks. Do traders really want Pepsi, Starbucks exposure in their technology trade? We don’t believe they do.
That’s why you can check our -1x tech baskets for pure play tech exposure, available with T212. Tickers SFNG, SFTG, SGFM. Available in USD, EUR, GBx
That’s actually a really good point! May not be the case of everybody, but it is a reasonable assumption that people interested in the QQQ long or short are mostly looking at the tech space specifically indeed.