I like trumpās stance, life has a cost I donāt want to spend my life paying for the elderly/vulnerable, we are the poorest generation (millennials).
This will lead to austerity which will also cause deathsā¦how you measure that tell meā¦
Iāve lost a job earning significantly more and have worked through the whole pandemicā¦I havenāt had a penny extra. Joke.
You really believe politics care for environment? Or in general well-being of common person?
The shift to renewable looks like just another power & control story.
Just check Bidens resume.
More customs on almost everything, problems with basically every international deal, tax cuts for the rich but missing money for infrastructureā¦ That sure sounds like a terrible thing from the economyās point of view.
Biden might be senile, but at least he listens to experts. If he passes away, Kamala might be pretty good.
Well what they say and what they do can be completely different, however the democrats have a more environmental stance than republicans. Biden has stronger environmental views than Trump. As mentioned the lessor of two evils.
You should see the NAK board on ST, with everyone in a panic that if Biden wins it means a potential roadblock in mining Alaska. They all want a Trump win as heāll overlook the massive env impact. The SP is either going to fall dramatically and take a year to recover, or triple next week.
Whether or not if someone dumped a load of cash on Bidens doorstep and he said yeah seems fine to me the next day continue the project is another matter.
āOr in general well-being of common person?ā Thatās a tricky one. Itās 99% about money and power and 1% caring".
If you want a better place for everyone I think the Democrats have that, if you want an individual every man for themselves fuck everyone else then Trumpās your guy.
Trumpās stance on global warming is ridiculous, no idea how you can deny it lol
Based on 350k entries, a majority of people in every state (besides Colorado) predict that Trump is gonna win tomorrow. This is from DraftKings election poolā¦
And this is something which is valid? There is many scientific debates on the topic, it is just about who has more power to push their agenda and narrative. Earth has been cooling and warming during its million year history. There is a lot of information on the subject, for and against such theoryā¦ should take it with pinch of saltā¦
Unfortunately share a roof with women who is PhD in environmental protection.
Global warming is natural we are speeding it up though at an excessive rate. This is a fact. You can see how the atmosphere has changed looking at geology and through studying ice, there is a clear correlation.
Actually we are about to hit mini ice age around 2060 +/- 10 years.
Likely less. We have high tariffs with the US currently because of the EU tariffs on the US. Trump doesnāt like imbalances in trade but that can be played strategically.
82% of Americans received a tax cut under Trump, his bill for tax cuts was broad and what we saw was tax cuts for most Americans as well as higher wages and more jobs. Iām not a fan of the guy but thatās just fact.
This is a nice data driven article about the topic of warming.
Thereās a difference between climate change and global warming. Weāre mostly interested in climate change, which is messing with the mother natureās AC.
And also who comes in power to actually believe or validate these findings.
A mate of mine bought an ice cream van when all the talk of global warming started, he thought he was going to make a fortune lol.
He is struggling to make a living, he is thinking of selling the van but finding work is another obstacle.
Sure, so point me to some well written article about climate changes, not including global warming. I am interested to read about it.
I just watched one news report about thousands of military and overseas workers votes will arrive after the election closes.
Trump doesnāt want these votes to be counted.
Goshā¦ why I didnāt come back here 
Really hoping for another meteor soon 
If anyone is interested in how the debate about global warming suddenly got an equal and opposite response for each claim and pseudo scientific bodies were created specially to discredit it i suggest āMerchants of doubtā.
" Merchants of Doubt tells the story of how a loose-knit group of high-level scientists and scientific advisers, with deep connections in politics and industry, ran effective campaigns to mislead the public and deny well-established scientific knowledge over four decades. Remarkably, the same individuals surface repeatedly - some of the same figures who have claimed that the science of global warming is ānot settledā denied the truth of studies linking smoking to lung cancer, coal smoke to acid rain, and CFCs to the ozone hole. āDoubt is our product,ā wrote one tobacco executive. These āexpertsā supplied it."
Plenty of merchandise here.
I donāt like either but Biden sniffs kids so I prefer trump lol.
