After a thorough compliance check, weāve discovered 17 ADRs which are not eligible to be held in an ISA account as per HMRCās rules & guidance.
We ask you to close, at your own convenience, any existing positions with these securities, as well as not hold them within any of your pies.
Should any positions still be left open tomorrow, Thursday, Aug. 27 14:30 GMT+1, weāll be required to manually close them.
The affected securities are: Baidu, Bilibili, Baozun, Foresight Autonomous, GSX Techedu, GW Pharma, JDcom, Jumia Tech, NIO Inc., NIU Tech, Pinduoduo, Qudian, Teva Pharma, Talend, Tencent Music, Trivago, Taiwan Semi (TSM).
Nothing changed. T212 were just āwrongā to allow them to be in ISAs in the first place.
Rules with ADRs are complex and you can find what Ive written on them in this forum. Itās to do with āparentalā company listing and hmrc rules on recognised exchanges.
ā¦ the nerd inside me compels me to verify all of these and see if I reach the same conclusion using the magic of the FinKi AutoISA APIā¦ automates ISA eligibility decisionsā¦so you donāt end up with problems like this.
Feels like T212 could get free and very valuable help from their overly nice communityā¦ but I feel like they donāt want itā¦Shame
ā¦ Iāve ran all those 17 stocks through the FinKi AutoISA API thingy and agree with them allā¦ but, I could have told T212 that months agoā¦ when the query first came up in relation to the NIO ADR.
Sorry people. T212 are correct (but wrong for havng let you purchase them in the ISA in the first place). You have to exit your position. Then I assume T212 will undertake the ISA repair process???
Itās a compliance and administrative and operational oversight. But itās not illegal. But itās bad PR. Once identified as ineligible you usually have 30 days to correct the position. T212 then need to do some maths in the background to reset the ISA and make it look like the subscriptions for inelegible stocks never occured - I think. They also have to monitor ISA compliance on an ongoing basisā¦ which I figure theyāll take a little bit more seriously now!!!
For the recordā¦but not legally bindingā¦ When events like this used to occur in the Brokerage Operation I used to manageā¦ we used to compensate clients IF the error was ours.
So, if we placed the stock in the ISA in error = Compensation.
If, for example, the stock delisted from a recognised exchange and became ineligible = No compensation.
So am I right in thinking that SEA (one of the more discussed stocks on this Forum) has got the OK for ISA eligibility? (If itās still pending or something, this would be good to know).