This might make an interesting discussion. TBH Iām on the fence. I see it very much as people should be entitled to either invest their money in a company, in the expectation of it doing well, or if you think a company has poor management and is unlikely to perform well against its peers, or is overvalued, why not āshortā, for a potential profit if you are right?
That is free will at the end of the day to do one or the other, and we have leverage shares on this platform as well as many others.
Short selling has been around for years, and although āshortingā can be bad for good companies trying to raise capital on an extreme scale, people need to ask why would anyone realistically short a āgoodā company, at the greater risk of making a loss?
I dont totally disagree with their argument, just the same on the opposite end of the scale something needs to be done about pump and dump shares (and this is where trading suspensions come in to an extent). I just dont think they truly have a grasp of what they are asking for here.
*There is a difference between short selling and lending shares.