@Harveyboy83 I agree but the same can be said for many other companies that are about to make a big announcement or propose an acquisition. For now, we’ll only be prioritizing IPOs.
I think IPO and SPAC should be treated the same in the sense that when people request specific ones and there’s enough of that request, they should be added - you can’t add them all with speed yet and that’s fine.
SPACS are growing in popularity and 212 is falling behind by not getting them quicker. People on the trading 212 and SPAC force groups on Facebook are getting more and more frustrated by this and now leaving 212 for other trading platforms because it’s falling on deaf ears
These are just the latest hype up pump and dumps imo. Everyone gets mad because the one they were definitely going to buy went 200% but the 6 others they were going to buy did shit.
Can you please show us something that isn’t doing well this days?
It seems that every nonprofit or losing company is increasing market cap by 20-30% daily. As long as the balance sheet is awful, stock price skyrocket…
Ohhh does is resemble some scenario in past??? I wonder
From thousands of high quality company with history/future and might make us steady growth YoY.
But no, let us speculate from thousands of startups which 0.01% will turn out to be new apple or amzn, while losing money on 99.99 % on this “promising acquisitions”…
They’re not all start ups mate. Most of them are private companies with products and infrastructure in place. Take FMCI(tattooed chef)
And OPES(burgerfi) for example.
I really think you should research SPACs mate because you’re making a lot of assumptions