Folder Pies and Regular Pies

Many of the requests for changes to pies appear to imply a misunderstanding of how pies function. For example, some users appear not to understand that buying and selling directly from a pie is in direct conflict with the act of rebalancing the pie. What I am about to suggest addresses this problem and others, for example, where users just want a way of grouping investments in what I would call a folder.

I suggest that there should be two types of pie, the existing or regular pie with percentage split holdings as now and a ‘folder pie’ which has no percentages and none of the functions such as rebalancing and distribution of new investment or dividends across all holdings.

In folder pies, the implementation of facilities like buying and selling directly into/from the pie becomes rational.

I further suggest that switching between the two types of pie would be possible albeit with warnings about the dangers of so doing. In particular switching back to a regular pie from a folder pie would need either a warning about the dangers of subsequent rebalancing or an option to reallocate percentage holdings based on current valuations.

I foresee other minor downstream implications but nothing I believe that renders this arrangement unworkable.

1 Like

What’s the benefit of splitting into two types, though?

Most of the functionalities people are asking for are very reasonable for a pie being used “correctly” as a pie. Splitting into 2 types means doubling technical effort to build and maintain something that’s not really needed.

Your suggestion of a folder can still do everything pies currently do (minus the balancing option, which can easily be added on). Everybody’s just asking for the folder. Whether it’s called a pie or a folder, I don’t think anybody really cares. People just need the flexibility and user-friendly interface to do what they want without jumping through all the hoops.

1 Like

It’s true that the pies aren’t designed for that, but there’s also a need for a function like some brokers have with the groups.

This an example at scalable Capital. I think the implementation of such future would be great. Only without an Max Limit sonuoh need to pay to make more than 1