Why we had to set a higher minimum for pending orders

To be honest I’ll have to move elsewhere too. There’s only really 1 competitor that’s similar which I think is a shame. One of the only reasons I’ve done well is investing small and building out a position based on limits. For me Ā£100 to start a position is very risky. Or if I want to take 10% profit of my Ā£100 I can’t do that either unless I’m constantly looking at prices.

I understand if 212 can’t cope with the too good to be true business model they created. It’s better if they never had these features in the first place then take them away.

It’s a very sad day for be personally.

One last thing, by saying ā€˜temporarily’ gives this a feel of interim. But from this post above it looks like a permanent change. It would be good to understand if all brokers are required to do this going forward

17 Likes