Ha, yeah I know. I’m only jesting
The beauty of the internet is that you can always find an article to back up your beliefs
Source:- an article found on Stocktwits that links to Motley Fool, so it’s pretty credible
Well I recommend going away and not checking it for a while, if you can not worth stressing over. But motley fool is not a lone in recommending this stock, there has not been any drastic event to cause this, so the best explanation is ■■■■ happens, i guess…
edit ugh… did the forum just censored that
Price targets are still at acceptable levels.
Analyst Firm | Analyst Name | Action | Rating | Action Price | Prior Price | Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Street Research | Initiates Coverage On | Neutral | Announces | 0.00 | 82.00 | |
Citigroup | Gabriel Gusan | Downgrades | BuyNeutral | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
HSBC | Neha Agarwala | Upgrades | HoldBuy | Announces | 0.00 | 85.00 |
Credit Suisse | Daniel Federle | Upgrades | NeutralOutperform | Raises | 31.00 | 100.00 |
B of A Securities | Mario Pierry | Reiterates | Neutral | Raises | 61.00 | 68.00 |
Susquehanna | James Friedman | Upgrades | NeutralPositive | Raises | 50.00 | 68.00 |
That 0.00 from Citigroup is really bringin the average down, huh?
I also find sh!t works.
I love it also when MF has articles within days on a stock both for and against lol, also when you see someone say something is their ‘top buy for a long term hold’, then at bottom it says ‘XXXXX doesnt own any shares in this company’ lol Its so odd when their Podcasts are good but their website clickbait.
That’s the problem with letting others post articles in your space.
it’s debatable if their podcasts or rulebreakers etc are useful or not. I’ve seen the debate in other threads, and that’s why I haven’t touched MF and I don’t want to dive into that bottemless hole in this thread as well
my personal opinion, motley fool, zacks insider monkey etc all full of garbage. do they have useful things inside? probably yes, but the broken clock twice a day adage
Yep, what I meant is some of the people on the podcast like Jason Mozer, Jim Ghillies, Matt Frankel etc give some good overviews and insights. I see it like a news show for US stocks, also if I hear about new stocks I then do my own research. Like BBC or other news, its a tool to use not to believe or rely on. The articles on MF people post are rubbish though.
I was just saying earlier I don’t envy Matt Frankel, he has the most boring segment on IF. He does a good enough job though. I like Moser, Sharma and Feroldi though.
DG on westudybillionaires is a recommended listen if you have a spare 30-40 mins.
Why is it falling so much today? Bad results?
Wow! And I was waiting for $26…!
Glad I’m still waiting
Yeah, I sold for a loss. I may regret it but I feel I can recoup my investment elsewhere faster than waiting for STNE to turn around.
You forgot, didn’t you?
Why is the shair price falling though?
I’m roughly down $70K on this stock this year, so thanks for the sentiment
normally I’d say, bad results? 50 odd percent of rev. growth and negative profit (loss) but they were both expected so god knows?
I guess their dependency on stable br economy and politics is hitting them? (not an assertion still trying to make sense) I am on holly so haven’t dug into things nor I’m following, but some random articles on SA says there might be a mid term recession in brazil? if there is surely it’ll effect a lot more than STNE including US economy?
Luckily I play with pocket money, but down 40% on STNE, buy the “dip” continuously…
I heard due to earnings but honestly didn’t do too much research. It just has been going down for too long and I eventually cut my losses.
@kali 70k?!?! That’s pretty high rolling.
He had 5% position in 2020. Under “Darlings” I guess by Kali’s standards he was(hopefully still is)pretty much “all in” on stne.